English 85, Sections A and F, Week 4 Paper Workshop – Peer Review Form

 

As a peer reader, your main responsibilities are:

§         to give the writer an idea of how his/her introduction and thesis statement worked in fulfilling his or her purposes (it leads up to what he/she has planned for the rest of the paper)

§         to give the writer an idea of how his/her introduction and thesis statement worked in fulfilling the requirements of this assignment (it provides a precise, clear, and debatable argument about a novel)

 

Directions:

 

1.       Read your partner’s introduction and thesis statement. DO NOT look at your partner’s outline at this point.

 

2.       In the space below, write down something positive about your partner’s introduction and thesis statement—something that you found particularly interesting, impressive, or helpful.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.       Now look specifically at your partner’s thesis statement.

 

Is the thesis statement specific to the text? Is it something the writer only could have written after reading the novel at hand? In other words, you couldn’t just substitute the novel’s name in the thesis statement for another novel’s name and still have something that makes sense.

 

                                    Yes            No            I’m not sure

 

If the thesis statement is on a topic similar to something that Prof. Mott lectured on, does it seem sufficiently different enough from his assertions so that the writer is making a new argument and not just regurgitating what was said in class?

Yes            No            I’m not sure            N/A

 

Is the thesis statement debatable?            Yes            No            I’m not sure

If you answered “Yes” or “I’m not sure,” briefly use the space below to try to write down what the opposite argument would look like. If you answered “No,” use the space below to explain why:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Does the thesis statement have something at stake that relates to understanding the novel as a whole and a position the novel might be taking on a specific issue (i.e. it refers to what the novel as a whole might be doing and is not just a description or analysis of a single character or set of characters)?

 

                                    Yes            No            I’m not sure

 

Does the thesis statement seem like something that could be proved in four pages?

 

                        Yes             Too big              Too small    I’m not sure

 

If you answered “Too big” or “Too small” explain what specifically seems too big or too small about it:

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.       Does your partner define all his/her terms (including those used by Prof. Mott in lecture)? Are there any definitions that seemed unclear to you that you think should be clarified? Are there any terms that he/she does not define that you think he/she could? If so, write them down here:

 

 

 

 

5.       On your partner’s paper, underline any sentences that seem unclear to you and circle any sentences that you think don’t belong in the introductory paragraph and should be taken out or moved elsewhere. In the space below, write any general comments, suggestions or questions that you have about the introduction as a whole.

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.       Now look at your partner’s outline.  Does he/she develop his/her argument in the outline by way of analysis?  In other words, does the writer plan to have each part of the paper build upon the previous part (i.e. he/she does not simply restate the same thing over and over again using different examples)?  Does the writer plan to use detailed evidence from the text rather than description? Comment below.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.       When you are both done, trade forms with your partner and ask your partner to clarify anything that he/she wrote that you do not understand.  Talk about what each of you plans to do to individually revise your introductions, thesis statements, and outlines.  Write down your plans below.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Where do we go from here?

 

Often, it is easier to critique other people’s work rather than our own.  However, you should be asking yourself these critical questions constantly during your own thinking, writing, and revising processes.  As you write your paper, you might find yourself needing to revise your introduction and thesis statement so that it goes with what you end up arguing.  If you would like me to look at your work during office hours next week, please feel free to bring it in or make an appointment. However, I will only look at it if you have made revisions that take into account the critique from your partner beforehand. Make sure to bring this with you if you come see me.